The privacy side of the issue is valid for sure, but the tru...

0c24e3235228f3ee...

npub1psjwxg6j9re7u5mf6j52gm4f9u50r2pexm0xrtrtgqpagq6y6s3qhfa504

hex

752b2910a2f122a3c8f820cd47ab641ed1238c02236146e5daa52e0ebea8f911

nevent

nevent1qqs822efzz30zg4reruzpn284djpa5fr3spzxc2xuhd22tswh650jygprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsqcf8rydfz3ulw2d5af29yd65j72834qundhnp4345qq75qdzdggs0y88mz

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-03-12T15:00:43Z

↳ 回复 EVAN KALOUDIS (npub19kv88vjm7tw6v9qksn2y6h4hdt6e79nh3zjcud36k9n3lmlwsleqwte2qd)

Spark server code isn't public. You have to go through their company to become an operator. RE LSP privacy, if you have client-side payment routing (...

The privacy side of the issue is valid for sure, but the trust model in terme'of custody is not so bad from what I understand, if there are enough Spark Operator involved at least.

Any LSP could also try to cheat as they perfectly know that no is running a watch tower so...

The most important issue I see is about privacy indeed, still but I can't unsee Spark as a good thing compared to full custody that many people used through WOS until now. I prefer to see the glass half full.

But we can imagine informal Spark entities runned by federations "Liquid like", with blinded signatures on top of spark. That would be cashu on steroids actually.

Best case scenario is obviously Ark + CTV + chaumian ecash.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "752b2910a2f122a3c8f820cd47ab641ed1238c02236146e5daa52e0ebea8f911",
  "pubkey": "0c24e3235228f3ee5369d4a8a46ea92f28f1a83936de61ac6b4003d40344d422",
  "created_at": 1773327643,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: The privacy side of the issue is valid for sure, b..."
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "2b7cdd09b3a4eef1a03a47bbb68ba99219efb66458d2c9547c05097fd2c5ec3c",
      "wss://nostr.oxtr.dev/",
      "root",
      "2d9873b25bf2dda6141684d44d5eb76af59f167788a58e363ab1671fefee87f2"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "44a9ab0c295d79ac688a8b283c3c7936df5fc685534ca11e1e5934e35490f10e",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "",
      "887a2d4320fe2cc5b1c933af2169e4c7036bd052d12c2f375e102c624a7fd48f"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "ea8558761be3049e9d2dc9b2044db5ce70176ae8a14ff1b62e8245fee57db407",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "reply",
      "2d9873b25bf2dda6141684d44d5eb76af59f167788a58e363ab1671fefee87f2"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "887a2d4320fe2cc5b1c933af2169e4c7036bd052d12c2f375e102c624a7fd48f",
      "wss://nostr.wine/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "50d94fc2d8580c682b071a542f8b1e31a200b0508bab95a33bef0855df281d63",
      "wss://eden.nostr.land/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "edb470271297ac5a61f277f3cd14de54c67eb5ccd20ef0d9df29be18685bb004",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "2d9873b25bf2dda6141684d44d5eb76af59f167788a58e363ab1671fefee87f2",
      "wss://nos.lol/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "0c24e3235228f3ee5369d4a8a46ea92f28f1a83936de61ac6b4003d40344d422",
      "wss://atlas.nostr.land/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "34d2f5274f1958fcd2cb2463dabeaddf8a21f84ace4241da888023bf05cc8095",
      "wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "The privacy side of the issue is valid for sure, but the trust model in terme'of custody is not so bad from what I understand, if there are enough Spark Operator involved at least.\n\nAny LSP could also try to cheat as they perfectly know that no  is running a watch tower so...\n\nThe most important issue I see is about privacy indeed, still but I can't unsee Spark as a good thing compared to full custody that many people used through WOS until now. I prefer to see the glass half full.\n\nBut we can imagine informal Spark entities runned by federations \"Liquid like\", with blinded signatures on top of spark. That would be cashu on steroids actually.\n\nBest case scenario is obviously Ark + CTV + chaumian ecash.\n",
  "sig": "bfaaf1834d6d9a490fb7405ddb5abcc8265f647f42488f2764b4168bce84aa337f2731855c4ea8b53d9ee55172d23f61e4129d8a38cfdf3f544a2d19b2c2d1e4"
}