"we can't, I repeat, can not, take away the consequences of ...

inkan

npub16xnpfx85k8wzdhctang6860g3u64lds5kac73ddjwlg0lxdg9g3su56z6l

hex

810702bc08fb2797c9f2eb79e78d1716eb6b4e09f8f25df9a0fca423fa1e0825

nevent

nevent1qqsgzpczhsy0kfuhe8ewk70835t3d6mtfcyl3ujalxs0efprlg0qsfgprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsdrfs5nr6trhpxmu97e5dra85g7d2lkc2twu0gkke8058lnx5z5gcxnecuk

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-09-09T09:32:13Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

3aec1cd219bede90b0706e590bb2cae9ff3b14a472019d6d6fb312cb175679db...

"we can't, I repeat, can not, take away the consequences of lost (or worse, stolen) keys as such."

Here is a system, functional and usable today, that greatly limits the consequences of a lost or stolen key from the time the rightful owner replaces the lost / stolen key with a new one.👇

Can you explain how your claim is consistent with the actual existence of this system? Are there any flaws in this system that make it non-functional in your opinion? If so, can you or anyone else point out these flaws with some degree of specificity?

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp5dxzjv0fvwuym0shmx350573re4t7mpfdm3az6mya7sl7v6s23rqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcqyqydc5vcy4z8zk350dsykgfkrq5uc2jvzmaa9k709hq88ku90gt5qs7r4gy

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "810702bc08fb2797c9f2eb79e78d1716eb6b4e09f8f25df9a0fca423fa1e0825",
  "pubkey": "d1a61498f4b1dc26df0becd1a3e9e88f355fb614b771e8b5b277d0ff99a82a23",
  "created_at": 1788946333,
  "tags": [
    [
      "q",
      "08dc51982544715a347b604b21361829cc2a4c16fbd2dbcf2dc073db857a1740",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "d1a61498f4b1dc26df0becd1a3e9e88f355fb614b771e8b5b277d0ff99a82a23"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "3aec1cd219bede90b0706e590bb2cae9ff3b14a472019d6d6fb312cb175679db",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "root",
      "5ea4648045bb1ff222655ddd36e6dceddc43590c26090c486bef38ef450da5bd"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "61bf790b2094afb03495c9e136acf615be0fccc2cb95b5acfb5f6ccefe18b062"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "5ea4648045bb1ff222655ddd36e6dceddc43590c26090c486bef38ef450da5bd"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "\"we can't, I repeat, can not, take away the consequences of lost (or worse, stolen) keys as such.\"\n\nHere is a system, functional and usable today, that greatly limits the consequences of a lost or stolen key from the time the rightful owner replaces the lost / stolen key with a new one.👇\n\nCan you explain how your claim is consistent with the actual existence of this system? Are there any flaws in this system that make it non-functional in your opinion? If so, can you or anyone else point out these flaws with some degree of specificity?\n\nnostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp5dxzjv0fvwuym0shmx350573re4t7mpfdm3az6mya7sl7v6s23rqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcqyqydc5vcy4z8zk350dsykgfkrq5uc2jvzmaa9k709hq88ku90gt5qs7r4gy",
  "sig": "aa88708d69ec00f12e8e2a2c8ecc56a39c20e6fd71ef9d90a67b6edaf8718cca2a6f77091e8cf0a90dbd902fb9bc79a35fc226bc59c9ea9a04ec3aed16ef7ff0"
}