My understanding is that if you want to move between bitcoin...

21_21_21

npub1hce578d83hff5c594p2pysunkhw24k3z7lj5czkd2vafs04y6v8q9ayrcy

hex

8d22586abb0274741e1d1ca7db33bfc75c9fb64d682aae574214df0cf3c84f03

nevent

nevent1qqsg6gjcd2asyar5rcw3ef7mxwluwhylkexks24w2appfhcv70yy7qcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgstuv60rkncm556v2z6s4qjgwfmth92mg300e2vptx4xw5c86jdxrsljfyk4

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-08-09T05:43:47Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

bba178f5af7e1495f442fc4411696e221609e5a5a75b697ee9abdec4f1d7f608...

My understanding is that if you want to move between bitcoins L1 and drivechains, miners have to sign off on that. Similar to how miners currently have to choose to include your transaction in a block. But my understanding is fairly limited.

When I have taken the time to really sit down and read and reason through the proposal, all of it seems reasonable to me. My only real objection is that at some point some of these other drivechains may break off from Bitcoins side chain (if they become more profitable to mine than bitcoins original chain). But we already face that cost and pay it via people leaving Bitcoin for other chains that are more capable. At least drivechains peg them to Bitcoin mining and incentivize continued production of Bitcoin blocks. AND keep decision making power with miners, not some unelected federation like Bitcoin liquid or various l2 proposals.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "8d22586abb0274741e1d1ca7db33bfc75c9fb64d682aae574214df0cf3c84f03",
  "pubkey": "be334f1da78dd29a6285a854124393b5dcaada22f7e54c0acd533a983ea4d30e",
  "created_at": 1786254227,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "b804cf1937581eeec7405eb12df03582da9cd7abf9c9ec3fac439aad2fe0f4af",
      "wss://offchain.pub/",
      "root",
      "be334f1da78dd29a6285a854124393b5dcaada22f7e54c0acd533a983ea4d30e"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "bba178f5af7e1495f442fc4411696e221609e5a5a75b697ee9abdec4f1d7f608",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "reply",
      "32637475ec0256fbd754571aeaa52c5454c9bd79fb7ac5b99f53b86cfcb9527a"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "be334f1da78dd29a6285a854124393b5dcaada22f7e54c0acd533a983ea4d30e",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "32637475ec0256fbd754571aeaa52c5454c9bd79fb7ac5b99f53b86cfcb9527a",
      "wss://ditto.pub/relay"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Amethyst"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "My understanding is that if you want to move between bitcoins L1 and drivechains, miners have to sign off on that. Similar to how miners currently have to choose to include your transaction in a block. But my understanding is fairly limited.\n\nWhen I have taken the time to really sit down and read and reason through the proposal, all of it seems reasonable to me. My only real objection is that at some point some of these other drivechains may break off from Bitcoins side chain (if they become more profitable to mine than bitcoins original chain). But we already face that cost and pay it via people leaving Bitcoin for other chains that are more capable. At least drivechains peg them to Bitcoin mining and incentivize continued production of Bitcoin blocks. AND keep decision making power with miners, not some unelected federation like Bitcoin liquid or various l2 proposals.",
  "sig": "b27f9c1913752decb162f5b394bb65382feb229858faa662841e9f20393a110cc8818f3001eacd4cc59e827af90b0872da360e5250c8f218d759ecc0daa8928c"
}