i see. It could be.

gojiberra

npub1g49uyac6d83sss7sln8aumsstle7m3wxwwvc8mmpqsnr8e9f2cdq6ltqvs

hex

8d6dea740e3c49ea8ea90b894949261128c16c28d4035060b4b85cb07b1b0937

nevent

nevent1qqsg6m02ws8rcj02365shz2ffynpz2xpds5dgq6svz6tsh9s0vdsjdcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsy2j7zwudxnccgg0g0en77dcg9luldchr88xvraassgf3nuj54vxs809y08

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-07-16T15:14:15Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

dfb0d37a0331a3eee5feb404249a30d87095de6a5a6070d08f3230a6e257c04e...

i see. It could be.

Logically, however, would you invite a stranger to your house to do illegal activities?

the logical answer is No.

SS demonstrates he doesn't know Saylor by his email to JE meaning Saylor has invited a stranger to a party if Saylor is logical, he would not expose himself to risk by doing illegal activities at a party to which he has invited strangers. If Saylor is in the JE ring, JE clearly disavowed him

there is however another possibility: that Michael Saylor runs his own drug and sex ring and was trying to double cross SS & JE.

mystery solved

this also makes sense, because what's the natural response to not being invited into the club?

make your own

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "8d6dea740e3c49ea8ea90b894949261128c16c28d4035060b4b85cb07b1b0937",
  "pubkey": "454bc2771a69e30843d0fccfde6e105ff3edc5c6739983ef61042633e4a9561a",
  "created_at": 1784214855,
  "tags": [
    [
      "p",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff",
      "wss://wot.utxo.one/",
      "Tauri"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "77f56243a824d22573fb755dd52c73c14986d15c0c98512d45f4deb08e9f879a",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "BitcoinIsFuture"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "f3d7c86e63b2537e9bc18c532fcd9701476b2a5512020279c3bd6fa41320275d",
      "wss://relay.fountain.fm/",
      "root",
      ""
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "dfb0d37a0331a3eee5feb404249a30d87095de6a5a6070d08f3230a6e257c04e",
      "wss://relay.snort.social/",
      "reply",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "i see. It could be. \n\nLogically, however, would you invite a stranger to your house to do illegal activities? \n\nthe logical answer is *No*. \n\nSS demonstrates he doesn't know Saylor by his email to JE\nmeaning Saylor has invited a stranger to a party\nif Saylor is logical, he would not expose himself to risk by doing illegal activities at a party to which he has invited strangers. If Saylor is in the JE ring, JE clearly disavowed him\n\nthere is however another possibility: that Michael Saylor runs his own drug and sex ring and was trying to double cross SS \u0026 JE.\n\nmystery solved\n\nthis also makes sense, because what's the natural response to not being invited into the club?\n\nmake your own",
  "sig": "0439650b0766ea1e41c6dc42015dde22fbabeb8f3ccdae623d522dd024dc166e6e31bc616afee854f9deb9476536640e6ade08d7e310ae1c59e590f5fd09427c"
}