> Gary Snyder

codonaft

npub1alptdev5srcw2hxg03567p4k6xs3lgj7f6545suc0rzp0xw98svse7rg94

hex

903717fbfe60e8c037c40f21e0056e387abe84bb4d1b78f19385db2f37d09f92

nevent

nevent1qqsfqdchl0lxp6xqxlzq7g0qq4hrs747sja56xmc7xfctke0xlgflysprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgswls4kuk2gpu89tny8c6d0q6mdrggl5f0ya226gwv833qhn8zncxgj52s43

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-05-21T17:26:35Z

↳ 回复 Peg Otis (npub1ngs4dyj46z36ne6lrh3wfjyrexlzu4s43plj9vhv76cczw7dtp7sf96dlu)

You can see Snyder read his poem live in this movie, which fits well with the surrounding context of this thread. I've watched the movie several times...

Gary Snyder

I'm not familiar, thanks. Love his contrasting self-introduction at the end of the movie.

I think it's important to embrace hope in the art of this epoch. Poetry programs us, and if it has the potential for transformations and self-fulfilling prophecies in particular, we'd better care to have a balance of positive and, ideally, truthful, realistic enough kinds of programs.

I get something more out of it each time.

Yeah, this is how we distinguish something really deep.

Same thing I notice especially from poetry itself, the amateur stuff I do for psychotherapeutic purposes in particular. Reading the same text I've already published almost always unpacks more layers of understanding: not just new meanings but broader meanings, both more connections between parts of a poem and connections with the reality itself. While the first drafts usually seem like very dumb translations of the unconscious; these draft texts may feel almost like total graphomaniac garbage even. I underestimate the complexity of this arational process almost every time.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "903717fbfe60e8c037c40f21e0056e387abe84bb4d1b78f19385db2f37d09f92",
  "pubkey": "efc2b6e59480f0e55cc87c69af06b6d1a11fa25e4ea95a439878c41799c53c19",
  "created_at": 1779384395,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "005abaaf35ab51cc6944513e77b4512b7299c3ec028fc423530518b3b15c7f5c",
      "wss://relay.pleb.one/",
      "root",
      "efc2b6e59480f0e55cc87c69af06b6d1a11fa25e4ea95a439878c41799c53c19"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "691443b7cbdeb1fe1253dc976d1d9e172fba5b11a32197f4bcdcac76aa951742",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "reply",
      "9a21569255d0a3a9e75f1de2e4c883c9be2e5615887f22b2ecf6b1813bcd587d"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "efc2b6e59480f0e55cc87c69af06b6d1a11fa25e4ea95a439878c41799c53c19",
      "wss://nostr.codonaft.com/",
      "codonaft"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "9a21569255d0a3a9e75f1de2e4c883c9be2e5615887f22b2ecf6b1813bcd587d"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "\u003e Gary Snyder\n\nI'm not familiar, thanks. Love his contrasting self-introduction at the end of the movie.\n\nI think it's important to embrace hope in the art of this epoch. Poetry programs us, and if it has the potential for transformations and self-fulfilling prophecies in particular, we'd better care to have a balance of positive and, ideally, truthful, realistic enough kinds of programs.\n\n\u003e I get something more out of it each time. \n\nYeah, this is how we distinguish something really deep.\n\nSame thing I notice especially from poetry itself, the amateur stuff I do for psychotherapeutic purposes in particular. Reading the same text I've already published almost always unpacks more layers of understanding: not just new meanings but broader meanings, both more connections between parts of a poem and connections with the reality itself. While the first drafts usually seem like very dumb translations of the unconscious; these draft texts may feel almost like total graphomaniac garbage even. I underestimate the complexity of this arational process almost every time.",
  "sig": "1b7e595cf421f6ec6ef08e9629765fb0079cc5fe3e3ff2db00499c455d01f682e0ad9634254288fb57c35f7a3449d3321c8c935d87e271a9ac5664e8fbd6765f"
}