Its not black and white.

FreedomMoneyIsFuture

npub1wl6kysagynfz2ulmw4wa2trnc9ycd52upjv9zt297n0tpr5ls7dqk5caw8

hex

92440abb0e121db40d949aee5d35c61984c14bc0294751507bc1ce70f308476d

nevent

nevent1qqsfy3q2hv8py8d5pk2f4mjaxhrpnpxpf0qzj3632paurnns7vyywmgprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs80atzgw5zf539w0ah2hw493euzjvx69wqexz394zlfh4s360c0xsdfl909

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-07-15T15:40:54Z

↳ 回复 Toxic Bitcoiner (npub1u87g378r0puytp7zxdl5awg2gmqvqc3vgtnh6a0vfgm4y8es7c3qam93f7)

I know. But let’s say a UASF had 5% of nodes and it failed. Would that mean that miners now have control? What about 1 of nodes?

Its not black and white.

It depends whether the UASF has relevance and incentive to the larger Bitcoin community including, node runners, hodlers, miners, economic nodes.

BIP-110 is valuable for miners because Bitcoin's value is being Freedom Money.

The DeFI use cases, the web3 use cases, the inscription spam use cases devalue Bitcoin. They all go to 0 on Solana, on Ethereum shitcoins, Naka, Citrea etc.

Less valuable Bitcoin is bad for everyone including miners. They loose less than 1% if they stop mine spam but their reward will multiply many times when Bitcoin's value in terms of government cuck bucks multiply. And it will multiply if Bitcoin stays Freedom Money because its the best money on planet Earth. We are seeing this for 15 years, except when Core v30 launched.

https://i.postimg.cc/C5YWtsZt/facts.jpg

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "92440abb0e121db40d949aee5d35c61984c14bc0294751507bc1ce70f308476d",
  "pubkey": "77f56243a824d22573fb755dd52c73c14986d15c0c98512d45f4deb08e9f879a",
  "created_at": 1784130054,
  "tags": [
    [
      "p",
      "e1fc88f8e378784587c2337f4eb90a46c0c0622c42e77d75ec4a37521f30f622"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "a832c83d15a4c63eefe9dc59efb6857a2f3a5eef5e41a42ae0803ac861646c2f",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "root",
      "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "035c52273d53f3b643187c92c2ac5968e5185965166b39e057665bb5d5fa7f91",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "reply",
      "e1fc88f8e378784587c2337f4eb90a46c0c0622c42e77d75ec4a37521f30f622"
    ],
    [
      "imeta",
      "url https://i.postimg.cc/C5YWtsZt/facts.jpg",
      "m image/jpeg",
      "x 8096c5495e9111eeaf585dfdef3dbfd58f9c0ae29e05fe68dd714543e38fe0b4",
      "size 77272",
      "dim 1199x781",
      "blurhash E03ucm?vx[E2Ipoz~q?v,@I:RPW:"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Its not black and white.\n\nIt depends whether the UASF has relevance and incentive to the larger Bitcoin community including, node runners, hodlers, miners, economic nodes.\n\nBIP-110 is valuable for miners because Bitcoin's value is being Freedom Money.\n\n\nThe DeFI use cases, the web3 use cases, the inscription spam use cases devalue Bitcoin. They all go to 0 on Solana, on Ethereum shitcoins, Naka, Citrea etc.\n\nLess valuable Bitcoin is bad for everyone including miners. They loose less than 1% if they stop mine spam but their reward will multiply many times when Bitcoin's value in terms of government cuck bucks multiply. And it will multiply if Bitcoin stays Freedom Money because its the best money on planet Earth. We are seeing this for 15 years, except when Core v30 launched.\n\nhttps://i.postimg.cc/C5YWtsZt/facts.jpg\n\n",
  "sig": "a2033464c25204db7323c0abdfd7db8077959b41a9c007148afc9595ab797baf6278713c2b355ba7b0039a47dfbe7d284f103b694f610b0175b5dd654035ccad"
}