Adam Smith was pretty smart, but he got a lot of the history...

npub1zthq85gksjsjthv8h6rec2qeqs2mu0emrm9xknkhgw7hfl7csrnq6wxm56
hex
9274f39b05d405aa51377769db06b6267b6c006adfecdd10ffe211eb2ca80c78nevent
nevent1qqsfya8nnvzagpd22ymhw6wmq6mzv7mvqp4dlmxazrl7yy0t9j5qc7qprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsp9msr6ytgfgf9mkrmapuu9qvsg9d78ua3ajntfmt580t5llvgpes4l09cpKind-1 (TextNote)
↳ Reply to Event not found
c6b6ec75ca56665d53066edd3a0cb2c63399152b148394d2de0890c07891656c...
Adam Smith was pretty smart, but he got a lot of the history wrong.
He was wrong to say that barter was typical. He didn't have access to the modern anthropological research.
He was writing in the late 1800's and was therefore, understandably, speculating on what seemed reasonable to him as he didn't have any good data to go on.
Of course, my point doesn't really address your point; you make a good point I guess. I'm just taking this opportunity to go a little off topic and ask everybody (not you, specifically) to be more nuanced in their research. Saifedean Ammous also makes embarrassing historical errors in his The Bitcoin Standard, and he doesn't have the same ignorance excuse that Smith had 😀
Raw JSON
{
"kind": 1,
"id": "9274f39b05d405aa51377769db06b6267b6c006adfecdd10ffe211eb2ca80c78",
"pubkey": "12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6",
"created_at": 1781632485,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b21d1d93367d78418eba151b933bd00ee8c9d862edd9879a4faae21e57c935bc",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"root",
"19f6b702319cd86be862856eaa7501f604bbd4936e006e918cce139b2a50d388"
],
[
"e",
"c6b6ec75ca56665d53066edd3a0cb2c63399152b148394d2de0890c07891656c",
"wss://nos.lol/",
"reply",
"df478568479de26b4a83c1bdc4dbab61b5cc82e1a312e2b28bc815a12a951e67"
],
[
"p",
"19f6b702319cd86be862856eaa7501f604bbd4936e006e918cce139b2a50d388"
],
[
"p",
"c1fc7771f5fa418fd3ac49221a18f19b42ccb7a663da8f04cbbf6c08c80d20b1"
],
[
"p",
"df478568479de26b4a83c1bdc4dbab61b5cc82e1a312e2b28bc815a12a951e67"
]
],
"content": "Adam Smith was pretty smart, but he got a lot of the history wrong.\n\nHe was wrong to say that barter was typical. He didn't have access to the modern anthropological research.\n\nHe was writing in the late 1800's and was therefore, understandably, speculating on what seemed reasonable to him as he didn't have any good data to go on.\n\nOf course, my point doesn't really address your point; you make a good point I guess. I'm just taking this opportunity to go a little off topic and ask everybody (not you, specifically) to be more nuanced in their research. Saifedean Ammous also makes embarrassing historical errors in his The Bitcoin Standard, and he doesn't have the same ignorance excuse that Smith had 😀",
"sig": "5ddd3aeb3dfc39327b1332816b7933ec601f938d80e97f531f80b8b8e41ed9a6312055d9ad13adc026ff6dbba1959e93acb21267b5621f06040b27021204afaa"
}