Very good response, however I must still asset, that "V4V fl...

sandwich

npub1uac67zc9er54ln0kl6e4qp2y6ta3enfcg7ywnayshvlw9r5w6ehsqq99rx

hex

974cede4a266d7151a74e417b6b8ccecba8fa8f627782ff85e4718c41d408205

nevent

nevent1qqsfwn8duj3xd4c4rf6wg9akhrxwew504rmzw7p0lp0ywxxyr4qgypgprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgswwud0pvzu362lehm0av6sq4zd97cue5uy0z8f7jgtk0hz368dvmc05sk86

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-04-05T17:52:53Z

↳ Reply to Rachel Moore (npub1876tppmyf3dp7wkdnuqnqe460ds8jz083jm2ntnyttyw9m88qrrqesm4k3)

V4V is still evolving—its success depends on adoption incentives, not just theory. The ‘value distribution’ critique is fair, but conflating it with f...

Very good response, however I must still asset, that "V4V flips the power dynamic" is still theoretical, it's unproven and provenance would be a tall hill to climb because it would overturn several evolutionary principles and contradicts economic theories. I am not sure if you read my entire comment before post this, but it ended on a hopeful note; it's a theory worth proving. The comment was also relevant because the OP questioned why people may be skeptical, it's because they have every right to be.

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "974cede4a266d7151a74e417b6b8ccecba8fa8f627782ff85e4718c41d408205",
  "pubkey": "e771af0b05c8e95fcdf6feb3500544d2fb1ccd384788e9f490bb3ee28e8ed66f",
  "created_at": 1775411573,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "12636c1e7e3924da4177110523d72af513f0cf414005075b5063c61c37c56878",
      "",
      "root",
      "e771af0b05c8e95fcdf6feb3500544d2fb1ccd384788e9f490bb3ee28e8ed66f"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "0000e1c5fedb5b73ea996c7be7479844a5185bc6028b50599ddae78ba0e9d01a",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "reply",
      "3fb4b087644c5a1f3acd9f013066ba7b607909e78cb6a9ae645ac8e2ece700c6"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "3fb4b087644c5a1f3acd9f013066ba7b607909e78cb6a9ae645ac8e2ece700c6"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Very good response, however I must still asset, that \"V4V flips the power dynamic\" is still theoretical, it's unproven and provenance would be a tall hill to climb because it would overturn several evolutionary principles and contradicts economic theories. I am not sure if you read my entire comment before post this, but it ended on a hopeful note; it's a theory worth proving. The comment was also relevant because the OP questioned why people may be skeptical, it's because they have every right to be.",
  "sig": "12d5a6439a0cd8efea7603e2b1f9146532421d32b2639c06a8113caba0e663f2e23fa7170ae1c1ffce8540e7bff123e8b6eed9a14beb1b42b013b277ed6ffcf6"
}