On point 3 yes, totally, more V4V shows are needed for sure....

npub1zw87r8y9ve2ghktj60vc5kaqzj4z3yg38ze8fagrjwef53x5cdwq0e2t83
hex
97bc9160479efba938123ca4277e915ea06659b16f8de067eb292abb93f62867nevent
nevent1qqsf00y3vprea7af8qfrefp806g4agrxtxcklr0qvl4jj24mj0mzsecprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsp8rlpnjzkv4ytm9ed8kv2twspf23gjygn3vn575pe8v56gn2vxhqm4xdseKind-1 (TextNote)
↳ 回复 Aaron of Essex (npub1c39tdmht8g896hyd3t5z47ksuwtmm77fyqxhmr7rac22d85lwsxqzk2lhm)
Don't know if any of these points have been made (Great thread by Matt btw.) 1. Tell the podcasters to use the v4v music in their shows. 2. We have ...
On point 3 yes, totally, more V4V shows are needed for sure. With all your experience of putting them on so far, do you find they are working better being attached to bitcoin conferences or as a standalone thing? Is it better for them to have their own identity and be live-streamed etc away from a conference? Is there a diminishing return in getting the same artists to repeat largely the same set at the same venue to largely the same audience, just like when a small band is trying to break through but needs a bigger audience? Should we try to work together to create a set of venues with V4V gigs that artists could move round in a sort of self organised tour? Or should people work together and book more flagship music venues and get artists to travel and hope the venue name excites a bigger livestream audience?
原始 JSON
{
"kind": 1,
"id": "97bc9160479efba938123ca4277e915ea06659b16f8de067eb292abb93f62867",
"pubkey": "138fe19c8566548bd972d3d98a5ba014aa28911138b274f50393b29a44d4c35c",
"created_at": 1779984817,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"bcb6bc34a29a4127c255c2b57408d02be1f997eb7b204ea427122bb7cb06a41c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"39ced2128f6cf1cef8a541704fdd0d2ae78edb4aa0aba8941496aded3eb4bfab",
"wss://primus.nostr1.com/charlie-echo-flint",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"fd2ee25fd0ef442aa1b7404a9354b12e554ec0dead81a6c8bdb8cda2ff09373f",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"f4b751440e32e678df712f76c5522634977c3992e6bd84a6a87e7ac6b4163f92",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"5cbe3588a59b246332a688a5466d4761195f21a4e6250754c866d47733d18b69",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"50a63cca15b16b60d329b92f628c432c8c12689b40fe9d0495eb836b5f2df637",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"28ca019b78b494c25a9da2d645975a8501c7e99b11302e5cbe748ee593fcb2cc",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"9c73236f565eb90bd4681c29ebb2d9c1b80e4e184cdbf84d6da742e990670cb6",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"c44ab6eeeb3a0e5d5c8d8ae82afad0e397bdfbc9200d7d8fc3ee14a69e9f740c",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "On point 3 yes, totally, more V4V shows are needed for sure. With all your experience of putting them on so far, do you find they are working better being attached to bitcoin conferences or as a standalone thing? Is it better for them to have their own identity and be live-streamed etc away from a conference? Is there a diminishing return in getting the same artists to repeat largely the same set at the same venue to largely the same audience, just like when a small band is trying to break through but needs a bigger audience? Should we try to work together to create a set of venues with V4V gigs that artists could move round in a sort of self organised tour? Or should people work together and book more flagship music venues and get artists to travel and hope the venue name excites a bigger livestream audience?",
"sig": "e64bef4124bc8c3e7b2f5e36b649174a4e5844f4fe186ca748fdc3259e480c811792bf1ac87a72f576f6c1d14634b2d6f2c1db277d9ac34ea0916f99564d6364"
}