1913 and the Federal Reserve act was essentially a coup imo.

npub10mtatsat7ph6rsq0w8u8npt8d86x4jfr2nqjnvld2439q6f8ugqq0x27hf
hex
adc7fa3d5e54f7dc037848874c7325e228725b771b2c6c3dc2e63b90a13751f7nevent
nevent1qqs2m3l68409fa7uqduy3p6vwvj7y2rjtdm3ktrv8hpwvwus5ym4racprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs8a474cw4lqmapcq8hr7res4nknar2ey34fsffk0k42cjsdyn7yqqyjc8y6Kind-1 (TextNote)
↳ Reply to Event not found
4dd3f0e135412515627554e4f0f1631eec16c4a4dfdbedcd1b8f076261442bf2...
1913 and the Federal Reserve act was essentially a coup imo.
- The establishment of a central bank
- The imposition of an income tax
- The popular election of federal senators
I never realized before what a major change the last point was. But before, state representatives would choose their federal senators, and the people would elect the state government, or something like that. The federal senators were therefore on a much tighter leash and under more direct scrutiny.
By shifting their election to the people, who can't understand whether the senators are actually acting in their interest when they're out in DC, it's easier to buy off senators and have them serve private interests rather than their states.
That's a major downgrade from the original system, and why I think there's a definite line that can be drawn between the original, working constitution and the post-coup constitution.
Raw JSON
{
"kind": 1,
"id": "adc7fa3d5e54f7dc037848874c7325e228725b771b2c6c3dc2e63b90a13751f7",
"pubkey": "7ed7d5c3abf06fa1c00f71f879856769f46ac92354c129b3ed5562506927e200",
"created_at": 1782702482,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0000bba22e4dbf13a32f8ee5dc2d2d4966d6c5218d92217dbf95e90ec8b04094",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fdcd4bf078eb2b71fd5a0d158dfe014eb1015b2f61042420074d48f6ba1e0449"
],
[
"e",
"4dd3f0e135412515627554e4f0f1631eec16c4a4dfdbedcd1b8f076261442bf2",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dab9562a4b156617923fb2bb31d59bab075ffa5f1f885a811fba468cba18162e"
],
[
"p",
"7ed7d5c3abf06fa1c00f71f879856769f46ac92354c129b3ed5562506927e200"
]
],
"content": "1913 and the Federal Reserve act was essentially a coup imo. \n\n1. The establishment of a central bank \n2. The imposition of an income tax \n3. The popular election of federal senators \n\nI never realized before what a major change the last point was. But before, state representatives would choose their federal senators, and the people would elect the state government, or something like that. The federal senators were therefore on a much tighter leash and under more direct scrutiny. \n\nBy shifting their election to the people, who can't understand whether the senators are actually acting in their interest when they're out in DC, it's easier to buy off senators and have them serve private interests rather than their states. \n\nThat's a major downgrade from the original system, and why I think there's a definite line that can be drawn between the original, working constitution and the post-coup constitution. ",
"sig": "05c288888b8bddd359c573e08f0220b984c70e1b5f464520be22ada321c424be6fc70ec26bda1b35616b5fa3151d6c736dc8176931e6ade35321235d20092494"
}