We've all been joking about the BIP110 fork because it distr...

21_21_21

npub1hce578d83hff5c594p2pysunkhw24k3z7lj5czkd2vafs04y6v8q9ayrcy

hex

b804cf1937581eeec7405eb12df03582da9cd7abf9c9ec3fac439aad2fe0f4af

nevent

nevent1qqstspx0rym4s8hwcaq9avfd7q6c9k5u674lnj0v87ky8x4d9ls0ftcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgstuv60rkncm556v2z6s4qjgwfmth92mg300e2vptx4xw5c86jdxrs49vyue

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-08-08T22:32:18Z

We've all been joking about the BIP110 fork because it distracts us from eCash and drive chains, a fork that points out actual, significant problems with Bitcoin. That's uncomfortable.

Drivechains offer workable solutions where Bitcoin doesn't continue to lose market share to chains that enable you to do more with your money, and do it easier.

Lightning is not the final answer. Spark isn't either. "Unilateral exit" is not enough if there's not even space for even a small portion of humanity to unilaterally exit at once. Let's be real, if the globe adopts Bitcoin and this is all we have, only banks and other large actors will be able to afford an on-chain transaction.

I'm not saying I support the eCash fork, I'm saying we absolutely need to be having that discussion and drive chains are closest I've seen to a proper solution to the L1 scaling issues. #bitcoin #drivechain #bip110

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "b804cf1937581eeec7405eb12df03582da9cd7abf9c9ec3fac439aad2fe0f4af",
  "pubkey": "be334f1da78dd29a6285a854124393b5dcaada22f7e54c0acd533a983ea4d30e",
  "created_at": 1786228338,
  "tags": [
    [
      "t",
      "bitcoin"
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "drivechain"
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "bip110"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Amethyst"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "We've all been joking about the BIP110 fork because it distracts us from eCash and drive chains, a fork that points out actual, significant problems with Bitcoin. That's uncomfortable.\n\nDrivechains offer workable solutions where Bitcoin doesn't continue to lose market share to chains that enable you to do more with your money, and do it easier.\n\nLightning is not the final answer. Spark isn't either. \"Unilateral exit\" is not enough if there's not even space for even a small portion of humanity to unilaterally exit at once. Let's be real, if the globe adopts Bitcoin and this is all we have, only banks and other large actors will be able to afford an on-chain transaction.\n\nI'm not saying I support the eCash fork, I'm saying we absolutely need to be having that discussion and drive chains are closest I've seen to a proper solution to the L1 scaling issues. #bitcoin #drivechain #bip110",
  "sig": "e86fbee52e9605a0c684eef93303cfc985805947f59a0717302f97a655046b19db82f85f50cf90c970150777aed9685e3f983861b58c7d639af4312e3147c121"
}