It’s not semantics tho. You sell a product for a price, wher...

corndalorian

npub1lrnvvs6z78s9yjqxxr38uyqkmn34lsaxznnqgd877j4z2qej3j5s09qnw5

hex

bcb9574906e0cd1d3951d5cdee9156d7c2b5d5d86dc5ed998f802330fbdb07a3

nevent

nevent1qqstew2hfyrwpnga89gatn0wj9td0s446hvxm30dnx8cqgesl0ds0gcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs03ekxgdp0rczjfqrrpcn7zqtdec6lcwnpfesyxnl0f239qvege2g6f6x7t

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-09-08T19:40:30Z

↳ Reply to SoapMiner (npub1zzmxvr9sw49lhzfx236aweurt8h5tmzjw7x3gfsazlgd8j64ql0sexw5wy)

I've had this argument before, and I believe it boils down to semantics. I, personally, believe that I have a V4V model. Others don't. I provide an ...

It’s not semantics tho. You sell a product for a price, where payment is sent and product is delivered. V4V content is posted without requiring a payment, with the understanding that some people who consume it will do so without providing any value in return, but also with the expectation that some of those who do get something out of it will return something of value to you. Money is the most potent way for them to do that, but it can be other things. This doesn’t mean selling a product for a price is bad/wrong, but they’re just two distinct ways of doing business. I could try to sell memes with a paywall, or subscription, but I have stuck to V4V instead.

Clayton just has a stick up his ass because he can’t fathom people enjoying memes enough to zap them. And yet, people do. Maybe he’s jealous 🤷‍♂️

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "bcb9574906e0cd1d3951d5cdee9156d7c2b5d5d86dc5ed998f802330fbdb07a3",
  "pubkey": "f8e6c64342f1e052480630e27e1016dce35fc3a614e60434fef4aa2503328ca9",
  "created_at": 1788896430,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "d012e86b117f1b70edf8682aaca3c069725a5357ee2206ee5403f2e4f5a9bb81",
      "",
      "root",
      "2bf73a30de37bc5ca054a0f15cda0030fcf2c6f8e373092fa4a5f78e27b3027d"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "e071becdf9fa9c54ec27783276379f3570cac2ad0a3264ebbab55dd2828deeee",
      "",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "10b6660cb0754bfb89265475d7678359ef45ec52778d14261d17d0d3cb5507df",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "2bf73a30de37bc5ca054a0f15cda0030fcf2c6f8e373092fa4a5f78e27b3027d",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Primal iOS"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "It’s not semantics tho. You sell a product for a price, where payment is sent and product is delivered. V4V content is posted without requiring a payment, with the understanding that some people who consume it will do so without providing any value in return, but also with the expectation that some of those who do get something out of it will return something of value to you. Money is the most potent way for them to do that, but it can be other things. This doesn’t mean selling a product for a price is bad/wrong, but they’re just two distinct ways of doing business. I could try to sell memes with a paywall, or subscription, but I have stuck to V4V instead. \n\nClayton just has a stick up his ass because he can’t fathom people enjoying memes enough to zap them. And yet, people do. Maybe he’s jealous 🤷‍♂️ ",
  "sig": "348f2581584482903bce57fa7dc2db91673457abc5a3152146d3ada972c994fe6949e522c559c5569321e0193ac3ea4672b5ee49acf3bff00081385dca2e7ee5"
}