Genuinely curious; would you say the same about an increase ...

675b84fe75e216ab...

npub1vadcfln4ugt2h9ruwsuwu5vu5am4xaka7pw6m7axy79aqyhp6u5q9knuu7

hex

c6e4859fb6086887b0662acc397bf5a5e9b1d802d0129ea0fd044cb1aa45161b

nevent

nevent1qqsvdey9n7mqs6y8kpnz4npe0066t6d3mqpdqy575r7sgn934fz3vxcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsxwkuyle67y94tj378gw8w2xw2wa6nwmwlqhddlwnz0z7sztsaw2qhdgugx

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-04-21T14:00:37Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

651a4ee887851cd966281b3275393af96aa852b9dd8dd13b4ff80b52be2d0023...

Genuinely curious; would you say the same about an increase in supply from 21 million to some extended schedule of emissions to secure mining? I'm guessing you would.

I do find it interesting that bitcoin could ultimately be 'hoist by its own petard' in this sense. Satoshi's 'set in stone' idea was that fully permissionless evolution of state of a fixed protocol is possible, using large scale proof of work. But that 'fixedness' is ofc just human consensus, and if the proof of work moves to a less ... stone-y system, the security is lost.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "c6e4859fb6086887b0662acc397bf5a5e9b1d802d0129ea0fd044cb1aa45161b",
  "pubkey": "675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728",
  "created_at": 1776780037,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: Genuinely curious; would you say the same about an..."
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "aa7a536baf93160bb2aaf55129b767cb694c60c1f5ceda5b9128cdc00a03dd84",
      "wss://nostr.wine/",
      "root",
      "675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "651a4ee887851cd966281b3275393af96aa852b9dd8dd13b4ff80b52be2d0023",
      "wss://nostr.lopp.social/",
      "reply",
      "f728d9e6e7048358e70930f5ca64b097770d989ccd86854fe618eda9c8a38106"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "f728d9e6e7048358e70930f5ca64b097770d989ccd86854fe618eda9c8a38106",
      "wss://nostr.lopp.social/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594",
      "wss://relay.current.fyi/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728",
      "wss://nostr.wine/"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Genuinely curious; would you say the same about an increase in supply from 21 million to some extended schedule of emissions to secure mining? I'm guessing you would.\n\nI do find it interesting that bitcoin could ultimately be 'hoist by its own petard' in this sense. Satoshi's 'set in stone' idea was that fully permissionless *evolution of state* of a fixed protocol is possible, using large scale proof of work. But that 'fixedness' is ofc just human consensus, and if the proof of work moves to a less ... stone-y system, the security is lost.",
  "sig": "e21787065b5fc50dc5f5c54d3d38bd22ea2538b0136082099acb0f0ff5c965447e8b16d1560739233676561eaa279e0bc768a56074983cbc064089e457c63f3c"
}