A user signs an event that they made a mistake and wants to ...

a0cb70d3208f5f7c...

npub15r9hp5eq3a0heantnja4sth3ug277nhse9f3scu937mxfh0mpw8snt7dpl

hex

ca2b1b6b8cea6904b6e58b92616cb916b3c7173cd67d5d023bf9673787b08538

nevent

nevent1qqsv52cmdwxw56gykmjchynpdju3dv78zu7dvl2aqgaljeehs7cg2wqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs2pjms6vsg7hmu7e4eew6c9mc7y900fmcvj5ccvwzcldnymhashrczd05nu

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-04-15T15:57:22Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

0000e3322f11a8b7ad95a50b6fb2b636f89b496f653994e45abc3028307af675...

A user signs an event that they made a mistake and wants to change something about their post. I would rather see their edit.

It doesn't go against cryptographic verifiability. If they try to maliciously change the content, that's easy to call out since you still have the original signed event.

Deleting doesn't exist either technically. But it's still better UX for relay operators to delete posts that the user wants gone. And most do. It doesn't unsign the event. Anyone who has a copy can still spread that around, but it's just a basic courtesy to delete something that they want gone. Same goes for edits.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "ca2b1b6b8cea6904b6e58b92616cb916b3c7173cd67d5d023bf9673787b08538",
  "pubkey": "a0cb70d3208f5f7cf66b9cbb582ef1e215ef4ef0c9531863858fb664ddfb0b8f",
  "created_at": 1776268642,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: A user signs an event that they made a mistake and..."
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "0000ac0546696497c78aaf55127e8ad48c0ed9fa56c5f1defd17e85e20f198ae",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "root",
      "e2ccf7cf20403f3f2a4a55b328f0de3be38558a7d5f33632fdaaefc726c1c8eb"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "895e19b9b004f7691452041c8bdd2cb9b781dc00063aad91f2cb80c635fb1b54",
      "wss://nos.lol/"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "0000e3322f11a8b7ad95a50b6fb2b636f89b496f653994e45abc3028307af675",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "reply",
      "e2ccf7cf20403f3f2a4a55b328f0de3be38558a7d5f33632fdaaefc726c1c8eb"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "678a308e59c24ee1b342b0fe9abdf6fdfa5dccc30aeb275a537e1f7fa0609fbc",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "e2ccf7cf20403f3f2a4a55b328f0de3be38558a7d5f33632fdaaefc726c1c8eb",
      "wss://relay.bitcoinpark.com/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Amethyst"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "A user signs an event that they made a mistake and wants to change something about their post. I would rather see their edit. \n\nIt doesn't go against cryptographic verifiability. If they try to maliciously change the content, that's easy to call out since you still have the original signed event. \n\nDeleting doesn't exist either technically. But it's still better UX for relay operators to delete posts that the user wants gone. And most do. It doesn't unsign the event. Anyone who has a copy can still spread that around, but it's just a basic courtesy to delete something that they want gone. Same goes for edits. ",
  "sig": "f644d348e97f7413c5106c2c53f445a959737c4dadaccf325ce1bb2ec2c6c1bf2ce69da4c07d629bdf24fc4fae7246c437fd7751d3afb33a39fe5009e3588992"
}