I think there's something missing here. Another illustration...

d1a61498f4b1dc26...

npub16xnpfx85k8wzdhctang6860g3u64lds5kac73ddjwlg0lxdg9g3su56z6l

hex

ce33973290fc8c720a7d91af32929b939b80d80d6aa84ab605fa78ac4bd2e54b

nevent

nevent1qqsvuvuhx2g0errjpf7ertejj2de8xuqmqxk42z2kczl579vf0fw2jcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsdrfs5nr6trhpxmu97e5dra85g7d2lkc2twu0gkke8058lnx5z5gcey8lvz

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-03-19T01:09:14Z

↳ Reply to Event not found

3457c703512fe708a29c34d61bc2c7716134bca93d474dbbe1ca5c708f7768ef...

I think there's something missing here. Another illustration:

Suppose it's the gym’s policy that the only persons authorized to use the gym on a given day are those who, on that day, have access to the privkey corresponding to pubkey X. Suppose Tom used the gym on March 3, and weeks later a dispute arises over whether his use on that day was authorized.

Tom presents two pieces of evidence:

(i) a Nostr event with a created_at set to March 3, validly signed by pubkey X, stating: “As of today, March 3, Tom controls this key pair and is authorized to use the gym”; and

(ii) an OpenTimestamps proof showing that an unsigned version of that event was recorded on Bitcoin on March 3.

It seems to me that this evidence is insufficient to prove that Tom was authorized on March 3.

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "ce33973290fc8c720a7d91af32929b939b80d80d6aa84ab605fa78ac4bd2e54b",
  "pubkey": "d1a61498f4b1dc26df0becd1a3e9e88f355fb614b771e8b5b277d0ff99a82a23",
  "created_at": 1773882554,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "00007d65c7d422ea94cabda92dc29768e3e2da2aad8bfae43599ea5f941c92f8",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "root",
      "40b9c85fffeafc1cadf8c30a4e5c88660ff6e4971a0dc723d5ab674b5e61b451"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "3457c703512fe708a29c34d61bc2c7716134bca93d474dbbe1ca5c708f7768ef",
      "wss://relay.nostr.net/",
      "reply",
      "40b9c85fffeafc1cadf8c30a4e5c88660ff6e4971a0dc723d5ab674b5e61b451"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "40b9c85fffeafc1cadf8c30a4e5c88660ff6e4971a0dc723d5ab674b5e61b451"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "I think there's something missing here. Another illustration:\n\nSuppose it's the gym’s policy that the only persons authorized to use the gym on a given day are those who, on that day, have access to the privkey corresponding to pubkey X. Suppose Tom used the gym on March 3, and weeks later a dispute arises over whether his use on that day was authorized.\n\nTom presents two pieces of evidence:\n\n(i) a Nostr event with a created_at set to March 3, validly signed by pubkey X, stating: “As of today, March 3, Tom controls this key pair and is authorized to use the gym”; and\n\n(ii) an OpenTimestamps proof showing that an unsigned version of that event was recorded on Bitcoin on March 3.\n\nIt seems to me that this evidence is insufficient to prove that Tom was authorized on March 3.",
  "sig": "327392ff6d46fcb515a46cd6e5ea9a2059dcd17b45e156edbd9616545f781bb983ca0bbbf391478ee516779734d76e6553c2ae5b973d1ba30358dcebb5c80a6e"
}