Had similar thoughts, for example is there anything we would...

umni

npub1vh22afuhde35lxp78hf0z7n3wfhqyvnfl2nkqhwhdydemfn9yfesjxkcfw

hex

dca138fe9b8f08cb8c5167b1e5bc7df52411437c34afa2cc57418cd4a7793456

nevent

nevent1qqsdegfcl6dc7zxt33gk0v09h37l2fq3gd7rftaze3t5rrx55aung4sprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsxt49w57tkuc60nqlrm5h30fchymszxf5l4fmqthtkjxua5ejjyuc8fce6u

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-05-25T01:03:32Z

↳ 回复 事件不存在

ae6d3ff34c5d2eb0013aacd02c3062419fced6ba664d1384dbb3d39cb93fcd34...

Had similar thoughts, for example is there anything we would like to be inefficient or is capped by some invisible bureaucratic inefficiencies, anything we would want the state to actually do?

Relating to your charts, maybe efficiency acts as the speed of the system, so increasing in efficiency would increase the emergence of underlying system problems. (Suggests all systems have a beginning middle and end)...

Interesting thought if we apply this to a technocracy that is achieved through total surveillance to maximize efficiency then maybe technocracy will never be stable, it would accelerate to the end stage quickly in less than a generation and technocracy is probably the end stage of centralized governance models.
(Also suggests centralized governance models are inherently unstable and were never meant for long term use, only use in case of emergency.)

Visualized as a chart it would just be a blow off top, when the base pair goes to zero.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "dca138fe9b8f08cb8c5167b1e5bc7df52411437c34afa2cc57418cd4a7793456",
  "pubkey": "65d4aea7976e634f983e3dd2f17a71726e023269faa7605dd7691b9da6652273",
  "created_at": 1779671012,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: Had similar thoughts, for example is there anythin..."
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "ae6d3ff34c5d2eb0013aacd02c3062419fced6ba664d1384dbb3d39cb93fcd34",
      "wss://nostr.wine/",
      "root",
      "6389be6491e7b693e9f368ece88fcd145f07c068d2c1bbae4247b9b5ef439d32"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "6389be6491e7b693e9f368ece88fcd145f07c068d2c1bbae4247b9b5ef439d32",
      "wss://algo.utxo.one/"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Had similar thoughts, for example is there anything we would like to be inefficient or is capped by some invisible bureaucratic inefficiencies, anything we would want the state to actually do?\n\nRelating to your charts, maybe efficiency acts as the speed of the system, so increasing in efficiency would increase the emergence of underlying system problems. (Suggests all systems have a beginning middle and end)... \n\nInteresting thought if we apply this to a technocracy that is achieved through total surveillance to maximize efficiency then maybe technocracy will never be stable, it would accelerate to the end stage quickly in less than a generation and technocracy is probably the end stage of centralized governance models.  \n(Also suggests centralized governance models are inherently unstable and were never meant for long term use, only use in case of emergency.)\n\nVisualized as a chart it would just be a blow off top, when the base pair goes to zero.",
  "sig": "6929c0e4025e0c6ee3e49892cd943c3c598ef1c5131314288b09701a574a69b48b9cc398e49ce8b2506d19f887259f5e64f2470a39e6e8e0c17f8d9fe6c9fdab"
}