Changing the subject for a moment: what’s your take on the B...

KompassFrei

npub1zexwnprn77qc8juaw5cv34xh8s90pwg49pzwcctvhgvrwaqlhgrszzrg9a

hex

e4381d04cc13a3a35aac33ed38e5cdb0adac74c50a9cd986c21a8b885207c800

nevent

nevent1qqswgwqaqnxp8gart2kr8mfcuhxmptdvwnzs48xesmpp4zug2grusqqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgspvn8fs3el0qvrewwh2vxg6ntnczhshy2js38vv9kt5xphws0m5pcvr3fm0

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-08-31T18:47:35Z

↳ Reply to Event not found

e4af6e226a17b738c10dcd75ede5446e12f220294abd3f29034fe8856ae6e757...

Changing the subject for a moment: what’s your take on the BIP-110 conflict—and, more importantly, on what the attempted split and its outcome tell us about Bitcoin’s consensus process? The network ultimately did not converge around BIP-110, and the minority chain stalled almost immediately. Do you see that as the system working exactly as intended, or as a warning that we may be entering a period where disagreements over Bitcoin’s economic purpose can threaten network coherence?

nostr:nprofile1qqsrycm5whkqy4hm6a29wxh255k9g4xfh4ulk7k9hx048wrvlju4y7spr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qyt8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yetvd96x2uewdaexwtck7nv40 nostr:nprofile1qqsvgd5v2yh8pcm9trapv7t8e4eleqag4yr75w9na45rtr7tm74smfsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy28wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2rg2p59q7zrwg7

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "e4381d04cc13a3a35aac33ed38e5cdb0adac74c50a9cd986c21a8b885207c800",
  "pubkey": "164ce98473f78183cb9d7530c8d4d73c0af0b9152844ec616cba1837741fba07",
  "created_at": 1788202055,
  "tags": [
    [
      "p",
      "32637475ec0256fbd754571aeaa52c5454c9bd79fb7ac5b99f53b86cfcb9527a",
      "wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "c4368c512e70e36558fa167967cd73fc83a8a907ea38b3ed68358fcbdfab0da6",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "164ce98473f78183cb9d7530c8d4d73c0af0b9152844ec616cba1837741fba07",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "32637475ec0256fbd754571aeaa52c5454c9bd79fb7ac5b99f53b86cfcb9527a",
      "wss://ditto.pub/relay",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "32637475ec0256fbd754571aeaa52c5454c9bd79fb7ac5b99f53b86cfcb9527a"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "164ce98473f78183cb9d7530c8d4d73c0af0b9152844ec616cba1837741fba07"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "c4368c512e70e36558fa167967cd73fc83a8a907ea38b3ed68358fcbdfab0da6"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "e4af6e226a17b738c10dcd75ede5446e12f220294abd3f29034fe8856ae6e757",
      "",
      "reply",
      "32637475ec0256fbd754571aeaa52c5454c9bd79fb7ac5b99f53b86cfcb9527a"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "40e17b58c1cc4ee6f3fc33953c6ce88cf8dc18c51b42bfdb1992f13d778ddee1",
      "",
      "root",
      "32637475ec0256fbd754571aeaa52c5454c9bd79fb7ac5b99f53b86cfcb9527a"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Primal Android"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Changing the subject for a moment: what’s your take on the BIP-110 conflict—and, more importantly, on what the attempted split and its outcome tell us about Bitcoin’s consensus process?\nThe network ultimately did not converge around BIP-110, and the minority chain stalled almost immediately. Do you see that as the system working exactly as intended, or as a warning that we may be entering a period where disagreements over Bitcoin’s economic purpose can threaten network coherence?\n\nnostr:nprofile1qqsrycm5whkqy4hm6a29wxh255k9g4xfh4ulk7k9hx048wrvlju4y7spr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qyt8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yetvd96x2uewdaexwtck7nv40 nostr:nprofile1qqsvgd5v2yh8pcm9trapv7t8e4eleqag4yr75w9na45rtr7tm74smfsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy28wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2rg2p59q7zrwg7 \n\n",
  "sig": "9cceac0b1a08b41d6650077077ac7cdf1f0d11f3c6f786a38e1dffd7c914c07e3e507393f37c1ab5016ee373d54d1f4df5255f35dd47d3d128a1904b578f00b3"
}