Its taken me about a year and a half simmering (and likely a...

liminal 🦠

npub1m3xdppkd0njmrqe2ma8a6ys39zvgp5k8u22mev8xsnqp4nh80srqhqa5sf

hex

e4e003f212758da3d069cce976267770f6f5afe0b57f93f563c131dccbfaa184

nevent

nevent1qqswfcqr7gf8trdr6p5ue6tkyemhpah44lst2lun743uzvwue0a2rpqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsdcnxssmxheed3sv4d7n7azggj3xyq6tr799dukrngfsq6emnhcpsrdfegr

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-02-21T20:37:30Z

↳ Reply to Event not found

bbeb9332436e405714d439317f6eac9445013e9a6d7617389dc21b6a0b6abe14...

Its taken me about a year and a half simmering (and likely actually understanding under 100 pages) on chapters and sections from Giles Deleuze and Felix Guatttari's "Capitalism and Schizophrenia" opus to begin internalizing what they're talking about.

"Becoming-Intense, Becoming-Animal, Becoming-Imperceptible" comes from A Thousand Plateaus, which I think I've digested more than Anti-Oedipus, but I find myself always coming back to Mark Seem's introduction to Anti-Oedipus as orientation:

"In order to carry out this ambitious undertaking, Anti-Oedipus makes use of many writers and thinkers, whose concepts flow together with all the other elements in the book in what might well be described as a carefully constructed and executed experiment in delirium"

"While Deleuze and Guattari use many authors and concepts, this is never done in an academic fashion aimed at persuading the reader. Rather, they use these names and ideas as effects that traverse their analyses, generating ever new effects, as points of reference indeed, but also as points of intensity and signs pointing a way out: points-signs that offer a multiplicity of solutions and a variety of directions for a new style of politics."

"Where Nietzsche grew progressively more isolated to the point of madness, Deleuze and Guattari call for actions and passions of a collective nature, here and now. Madness is a radical break from power in the form of a disconnection."

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "e4e003f212758da3d069cce976267770f6f5afe0b57f93f563c131dccbfaa184",
  "pubkey": "dc4cd086cd7ce5b1832adf4fdd1211289880d2c7e295bcb0e684c01acee77c06",
  "created_at": 1771706250,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: Its taken me about a year and a half simmering (an..."
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "d7f804218b36d4c2e14783ac47dc1c12b7adeb4305a2a4efede4ed04141c8f01",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "root",
      "dc4cd086cd7ce5b1832adf4fdd1211289880d2c7e295bcb0e684c01acee77c06"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "3bc3b46a01e19584d6741b40651f510be5f2a150e46bb47959d962b9ba36347f",
      "wss://nostr.wine/",
      "",
      "2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "d71adc4cb19e2dd7ff5c2d2fb756936ecafdbde49a75add48b92e2988b299779",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "",
      "dc4cd086cd7ce5b1832adf4fdd1211289880d2c7e295bcb0e684c01acee77c06"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "bbeb9332436e405714d439317f6eac9445013e9a6d7617389dc21b6a0b6abe14",
      "wss://theforest.nostr1.com/",
      "reply",
      "55f573b651eff351db57b0601d23022d8c532f9825db10a5733ebf39be4aa21b"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "55f573b651eff351db57b0601d23022d8c532f9825db10a5733ebf39be4aa21b",
      "wss://theforest.nostr1.com/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "0689df5847a8d3376892da29622d7c0fdc1ef1958f4bc4471d90966aa1eca9f2",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "dc4cd086cd7ce5b1832adf4fdd1211289880d2c7e295bcb0e684c01acee77c06",
      "wss://theforest.nostr1.com/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331",
      "wss://spatia-arcana.com/"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Its taken me about a year and a half simmering (and likely actually understanding under 100 pages) on chapters and sections from Giles Deleuze and Felix Guatttari's \"Capitalism and Schizophrenia\" opus to begin internalizing what they're talking about. \n\n\"Becoming-Intense, Becoming-Animal, Becoming-Imperceptible\" comes from A Thousand Plateaus, which I think I've digested more than Anti-Oedipus, but I find myself always coming back to Mark Seem's introduction to Anti-Oedipus as orientation: \n\n\"In  order to carry out  this  ambitious undertaking, Anti-Oedipus makes use of many writers and thinkers, whose concepts flow together with all the other elements in the book in what  might well be described as a carefully constructed and executed experiment in delirium\"\n\n\"While Deleuze  and Guattari use  many authors and  concepts, this is never done in an  academic fashion aimed at persuading the reader. Rather,  they use these names and ideas as effects that traverse their analyses, generating ever new effects, as points of reference indeed, but also as points of  intensity and signs pointing a  way out: points-signs  that offer a multiplicity  of solutions and  a variety  of directions  for a new style of politics.\"\n\n \"Where Nietzsche grew progressively more isolated  to the point of madness, Deleuze and Guattari call for actions and passions of a \ncollective nature,  here and now.  Madness is a radical break from power in the form of a disconnection.\"",
  "sig": "14de0645255db609d55f933bc4dc2e2dad9847c22ea5d7571c21c1764f28194c740c0487cb93e95b4fcf8d6934497cc75780cf41ff15cd4d5c75d8faaaaee446"
}