If there were truly “selective sweeps,” then those cases als...

CR¥P7ΩWØLF

npub16jknkmh2luflurx2epkj99qyj7v2ut3ew7t2mfd7xxt9jtjku2nsj2gqp0

hex

e83296b53faee1accf31c7760ab1300a5b4e004a6434577400c8018fbc0d0c96

nevent

nevent1qqswsv5kk5l6acdveucuwas2kycq5k6wqp9xgdzhwsqvsqv0hsxse9sprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsdftfmdm407yl7pn9vsmfzjszf0x9w9cuh094d5klrr9je9etw9fcd7kn5v

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-07-31T16:51:54Z

↳ 回复 a74d0dea... (npub15axsm63lprp2fsx6k8k7zx4k3pxz8k3q7muy95huzz5hwsl8qcrq4g4hv7)

I’m pretty sure there were plenty of others that had selective sweeps…

If there were truly “selective sweeps,” then those cases also don’t map cleanly to the Mk3 flaw. The randomness bug doesn’t give an attacker partial access. it gives them the full seed. Once the seed is weak, every UTXO derived from it is equally exposed.

Selective movement means something else was different between those UTXOs: a separate backup path, a reused seed, a partially‑exposed key, or an external leak. The Mk3 flaw is deterministic. Selective behavior isn’t.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "e83296b53faee1accf31c7760ab1300a5b4e004a6434577400c8018fbc0d0c96",
  "pubkey": "d4ad3b6eeaff13fe0ccac86d2294049798ae2e397796ada5be3196592e56e2a7",
  "created_at": 1785516714,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "fa37a2400b5688ef67bfb64c19b9ab2ddd582a6b2bda0ab92b0e137758f34166",
      "wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/",
      "root",
      "3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "bf8cfad62aebfbf05a1719ae0b66091e13fe09dc9e91e972849e585a9e8e3e19",
      "wss://relay.ditto.pub/",
      "reply",
      "a74d0dea3f08c2a4c0dab1ede11ab6884c23da20f6f842d2fc10a97743e70606"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "a74d0dea3f08c2a4c0dab1ede11ab6884c23da20f6f842d2fc10a97743e70606"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "5a288f11c00b37df47c3bfe95e5397288d99951fe8100c228399cf2ab8c4517e"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "3f770d65d3a764a9c5cb503ae123e62ec7598ad035d836e2a810f3877a745b24"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Ditto",
      "31990:781a1527055f74c1f70230f10384609b34548f8ab6a0a6caa74025827f9fdae5:ditto"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "If there were truly “selective sweeps,” then those cases also don’t map cleanly to the Mk3 flaw. The randomness bug doesn’t give an attacker partial access.  it gives them the full seed. Once the seed is weak, every UTXO derived from it is equally exposed.\n\nSelective movement means something else was different between those UTXOs: a separate backup path, a reused seed, a partially‑exposed key, or an external leak. The Mk3 flaw is deterministic. Selective behavior isn’t.",
  "sig": "92f0a8aa58c923b50b3052723764e9ce346d59bde902ecb2bf8d950912688a22753f1ff3225580c079f69e8ba442e51f87add62d10ace1363407f37cee0022d9"
}