That bip110 is not intended to be a solution to "spam", but ...

0d97beae567fcec9...

npub1pktmatjk0l8vn3jhfuwxaasjd65kn4ye9sce3egup7k993f8fg2q5tpxa6

hex

ec167fd8b7b5b2925122011a7b17c5954744ecdea01b7079f1d4a8bc26588e6a

nevent

nevent1qqswc9nlmzmmtv5j2y3qzxnmzlze236yan02qxms08caf29uyevgu6sprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsqm9a74et8lnkfcet578rw7cfxa2tf6jvjcvvcu5wqltzjc5n559qggf9yk

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-07-29T21:19:42Z

↳ Reply to Event not found

46ca056ad21b928022e6053bffe2086f241cc46e18cfbd1038b4e033967cbe51...

That bip110 is not intended to be a solution to "spam", but it is intended to be a signal that spam/non monetary use is generally unwelcome.

There is a primary use case and not everything is that primary use case. This is why I quoted the word spam, because English is hard and using words without defining them leads to double speak.

Bip110 intends to signal that the most recent changes that welcomes experimentation using the op_return is not an invitation to redefine bitcoin's primary use case -- considering that it has limited resources, and there are not many (any?) use cases of a larger use of this field that don't intend to use up more of those resources for private secondary reasons.

Yes you could always use OP_RETURN unbounded technically, but it was awkward, now it is as good as a supported feature.

A fence does not stop people from entering your garden, but it does deter it.

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "ec167fd8b7b5b2925122011a7b17c5954744ecdea01b7079f1d4a8bc26588e6a",
  "pubkey": "0d97beae567fcec9c6574f1c6ef6126ea969d4992c3198e51c0fac52c5274a14",
  "created_at": 1785359982,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "4e1a64714faa2579cbbe520a147cfbacb45a2fd75d24f54e2e22c881baea63c1",
      "wss://nos.lol/",
      "root",
      "32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "5305a30d32e43964de66db4179d4e7f54b0415545e206fbf9c0233ed344a39ae",
      "ws://127.0.0.1:4869/",
      "",
      "0d97beae567fcec9c6574f1c6ef6126ea969d4992c3198e51c0fac52c5274a14"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "46ca056ad21b928022e6053bffe2086f241cc46e18cfbd1038b4e033967cbe51",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "reply",
      "32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "0d97beae567fcec9c6574f1c6ef6126ea969d4992c3198e51c0fac52c5274a14",
      "wss://nos.lol/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245",
      "ws://relay.jb55.com/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Amethyst"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "That bip110 is not intended to be a solution to \"spam\", but it is intended to be a signal that spam/non monetary use is generally unwelcome.\n\nThere is a primary use case and not everything is that primary use case. This is why I quoted the word spam, because English is hard and using words without defining them leads to double speak.\n\nBip110 intends to signal that the most recent changes that welcomes experimentation using the op_return is not an invitation to redefine bitcoin's primary use case -- considering that it has limited resources, and there are not many (any?) use cases of a larger use of this field that don't intend to use up more of those resources for private secondary reasons.\n\nYes you could always use OP_RETURN unbounded technically, but it was awkward, now it is as good as a supported feature.\n\nA fence does not stop people from entering your garden, but it does deter it.",
  "sig": "401f12bc66b49055b2225578acdb99fd3193ecaec6758006268071a52be55c43232e7a7e3aeb02beced7dc3a7715c6711d954f5814811be97fb996993f139220"
}