There's an argument atheists like to make regarding Jesus's ...

Thursday 5∞

npub1hl0zy55rxqwd7anvf9nh9ms78kryee4zkf32nfwglgc5gmrm3hpqmslhas

hex

ee4310899425cd4bb6071b919fd32e3fe3f9a37a144f21fa5609bd1aa390da69

nevent

nevent1qqswuscs3x2ztn2tkcr3hyvl6vhrlcle5dapgneplftqn0g65wgd56gprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgstlh3z22pnq8xlwekyjemjac0rmpjvu63tyc4f5hy05v2yd3acmsswkw907

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-05-31T17:10:51Z

There's an argument atheists like to make regarding Jesus's skin color. Logically, because he was born in the middle east more or less around 4 BC, his color must have been mediteranean at best.

There are many fallacies in this argument but the most important thing to understand is that ultimately it doesn't matter. God made flesh is for everyone to benefit. There is no point in trying to prove a shade over another. For all you care He could have been blue with purple eyes. Would this change any of his teachings and deeds? No.

The paintings of the so-called Resistance portrait Him white and rather slim fit. Now you might say the Italians were biased, but it's risky to argue against this if you haven't had the great encounter yourself. But you don’t believe in any of this, so...

The overwhelming majority of new age enthusiasts do not distinguish between Lucifer's light and Christ's light. Since Lucifer really likes to mimic Christ, the confusion is somehow understandable. I say persist and see for yourself. Definitely beware tho, because that fire really really burns.

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "ee4310899425cd4bb6071b919fd32e3fe3f9a37a144f21fa5609bd1aa390da69",
  "pubkey": "bfde225283301cdf766c496772ee1e3d864ce6a2b262a9a5c8fa31446c7b8dc2",
  "created_at": 1780247451,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: There's an argument atheists like to make regardin..."
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Amethyst"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "There's an argument atheists like to make regarding Jesus's skin color. Logically, because he was born in the middle east more or less around 4 BC, his color must have been mediteranean at best.\n\nThere are many fallacies in this argument but the most important thing to understand is that ultimately it doesn't matter. God made flesh is for everyone to benefit. There is no point in trying to prove a shade over another. For all you care He could have been blue with purple eyes. Would this change any of his teachings and deeds? No.\n\nThe paintings of the so-called Resistance portrait Him white and rather slim fit. Now you might say the Italians were biased, but it's risky to argue against this if you haven't had the great encounter yourself. But you don’t believe in any of this, so...\n\nThe overwhelming majority of new age enthusiasts do not distinguish between Lucifer's light and Christ's light. Since Lucifer really likes to mimic Christ, the confusion is somehow understandable. I say persist and see for yourself. Definitely beware tho, because that fire really really burns.",
  "sig": "825b6af8781d7b098a0715b115bb04df56f7700c069ced3239e302543c107728739c6e43a30f26cf8fae42277699c9da808a6779087c51d5e89b205e9db8f4ec"
}