I think yea. The hitman is absolutely violating the NAP, but...

vinney...axkl

npub19ma2w9dmk3kat0nt0k5dwuqzvmg3va9ezwup0zkakhpwv0vcwvcsg8axkl

hex

fdd132a556a978aa9c50b341fe6580b7c124a2de76d862c544d1448ea7f3a5c5

nevent

nevent1qqs0m5fj54t2j792n3gtxs07vkqt0sfy5t08dkrzc4zdz3yw5le6t3gprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsza748zkamgmw4he4hm2xhwqpxd5gkwju38wqh3twmtshx8kv8xvgjpvhvs

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-06-10T21:02:01Z

↳ 回复 010df0c9... (npub1qyxlpj2gl6dt2nfvkl4yyrl6pr2hjkycrdh2dr5r42n7ktwn7pdqrdmu7u)

So I can hire a hitman and say I have never violated NAP?

I think yea. The hitman is absolutely violating the NAP, but you aren’t. You’re doing something else that I’m pretty sure would get you ostracized or penalized in any Ancapistan, just like trespassing and contract violation isn’t a NAP transgression, but is (voluntarily) agreed to be verboten anyway.

It’s not just “preserves NAP: okay; violates NAP: not okay”. latter, yes. former… depends on the community and their norms and agreements. If you squint the right way, “hitman” or at least “contract enforcer” is basically an expected piece of a voluntarist, NAP-respecting society.
What if you have an agreement with your neighbor that if either knowingly steals the others vegetables, he is consenting to being hunted down and murdered. When your neighbor takes your cucumber, he’s going to expect your “hitman” to come after him.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "fdd132a556a978aa9c50b341fe6580b7c124a2de76d862c544d1448ea7f3a5c5",
  "pubkey": "2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331",
  "created_at": 1781125321,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "1a40aa418672da880ddfdf7475761e91c975413a3e44fff9b9f672276f08f33a",
      "wss://nostr.wine/",
      "root",
      "010df0c948fe9ab54d2cb7ea420ffa08d57958981b6ea68e83aaa7eb2dd3f05a"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "60b494b8abca503d716aeb088985d2fa208bfa43aef08072902870d98b0ed831",
      "wss://nos.lol",
      "reply",
      "010df0c948fe9ab54d2cb7ea420ffa08d57958981b6ea68e83aaa7eb2dd3f05a"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "010df0c948fe9ab54d2cb7ea420ffa08d57958981b6ea68e83aaa7eb2dd3f05a"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Damus"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "I think yea. The hitman is absolutely violating the NAP, but you aren’t. You’re doing something else that I’m pretty sure would get you ostracized or penalized in any Ancapistan, just like trespassing and contract violation isn’t a NAP transgression, but is (voluntarily) agreed to be verboten anyway.\n\nIt’s not just “preserves NAP: okay; violates NAP: not okay”. latter, yes. former… depends on the community and their norms and agreements. If you squint the right way, “hitman” or at least “contract enforcer” is basically an expected piece of a voluntarist, NAP-respecting society.  \nWhat if you have an agreement with your neighbor that if either knowingly steals the others vegetables, he is consenting to being hunted down and murdered. When your neighbor takes your cucumber, he’s going to expect your “hitman” to come after him.",
  "sig": "ce393b8a3627109c5684751e1a227748815973118c7e744b99b10fd0ed258928292407bcb32ed165f4008d5a55f2ec1c80a888f4b7a3867dee49d64cac881ba8"
}