the bip110 debate has exposed a basic confusion about censor...

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "fff50a490f883429d2323801e717bd916521ea3f4419312156d37dfcb3c203d5",
  "pubkey": "749ebea9c2c103fc1cda8ad0d68f3391085d81533f5e642b833bf90667a4568b",
  "created_at": 1783954599,
  "tags": [
    [
      "r",
      "wss://nos.lol/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://nostr.wine/"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "wss://nostr.land/"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Primal Web"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "the bip110 debate has exposed a basic confusion about censorship\n\ncensorship is preventing someone who follows the network’s rules from using the protocol\n\nchanging the rules of the protocol (bip110) is not censorship\n\nwas segwit censorship? taproot? the 2010 inflation bug fix?\n\nrule changes are explicit, universal, and uniformly enforced\n\ncensorship is targeted \u0026 discretionary \n\nwhether you support bip110 or oppose it, you should at least know what censorship means",
  "sig": "2f01475aea7102797a61a359daa377ad2d2a115dc111f02acaa3a77cff15c821afd01ec3c3513125c0f4f01f66a938299362a1b3f394e83d210677475e636b81"
}