Jack Mallers doesn't come across well at all in his What Bit...

Nic

npub134u08yp6rdcgcamfdcra9aysvhne9wpssft8ntm9qvfu95erxdcqx9qjkm

hex

177bb23f60902e6b3967204c65d88e65c16bd0a801b2550701aac5581e0f6576

nevent

nevent1qqspw7aj8asfqtnt89njqnr9mz8xtstt6z5qrvj4quq6432crc8k2asprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsg678njqapkuyvwa5kup7j7jgxteujhqcgy4ne4ajsxy7z6v3nxuqe48rse

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-07-30T20:13:51Z

Jack Mallers doesn't come across well at all in his What Bitcoin Did interview with Danni. I couldn't make it past the first 20 minutes.

Sure, I only listened for a short period, but one thing became pretty obvious, in that he doesn't seem willing to explain what the actual disagreement was between what the board wanted and what he wanted. And after listening, I still have no idea what 21 actually did, or does. Does anyone?

Somehow, without really explaining anything, he's constructing a narrative in which he's the heroic figure who acted with integrity, owned his mistakes, and walked away on principle. Yet he never seems to explain what exactly demonstrates that integrity.

He led his followers to the slaughter while taking millions in fiat and walking away.

For someone who constantly preaches about creating value, he sure managed to extract a lot of it.

He says he isn't a Wall Street guy, but he sure plays the part well.

#2sats

https://youtu.be/pVhTkdfhhhE

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "177bb23f60902e6b3967204c65d88e65c16bd0a801b2550701aac5581e0f6576",
  "pubkey": "8d78f3903a1b708c77696e07d2f49065e792b830825679af650313c2d3233370",
  "created_at": 1785442431,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: Jack Mallers doesn't come across well at all in hi..."
    ],
    [
      "t",
      "2sats"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "https://youtu.be/pVhTkdfhhhE"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Jack Mallers doesn't come across well at all in his What Bitcoin Did interview with Danni. I couldn't make it past the first 20 minutes.\n\nSure, I only listened for a short period, but one thing became pretty obvious, in that he doesn't seem willing to explain what the actual disagreement was between what the board wanted and what he wanted. And after listening, I still have no idea what 21 actually did, or does. Does anyone?\n\nSomehow, without really explaining anything, he's constructing a narrative in which he's the heroic figure who acted with integrity, owned his mistakes, and walked away on principle. Yet he never seems to explain what exactly demonstrates that integrity.\n\nHe led his followers to the slaughter while taking millions in fiat and walking away. \n\nFor someone who constantly preaches about creating value, he sure managed to extract a lot of it.\n\nHe says he isn't a Wall Street guy, but he sure plays the part well.\n\n#2sats\n\nhttps://youtu.be/pVhTkdfhhhE",
  "sig": "f1749cd12a1b9428f3712e35650870e9ce616edf8822f5dd4ccd13301b12e39276e0e77ef5380811af1f17da6ea978bdce8db19c3ffe13ff0f2011b08d7286c0"
}