Bitcoin hasn’t repeated Gold’s history, not even a little. G...

Tauri | Bitcoin BLAKE2b (XBT)

npub1x9q89st049pnuym57ch9kqkgzcu5dmff32wduwc4g9gnc2w3nlls8hcsg7

hex

1c797f9d25ba3b4382dc73154c035bdf93a2d513a6648b0dd472fa54fe531229

nevent

nevent1qqspc7tln5jm5w6rstw8x92vqddalyaz65f6veytph2897j5lef3y2gprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsrzsrjc9h6jse7zd60vtjmqtypvw2xa55c48x78v25z5fu98gellc6k0vh4

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-08-15T08:28:55Z

↳ 回复 c40cd957... (npub1csxdj4my3wtuk76a3vv080e6re67g7whmwra75chnzu2nwgtuh6ql93h4z)

I think you are right on coordination and history so far, still why did Bitcoin manage to repeat Gold’s history so far? Speed run of 5000 years or mor...

Bitcoin hasn’t repeated Gold’s history, not even a little. Gold was the dominant monetary standard of the world for millennia. Bitcoin hasn’t even managed that on a local level. It certainly had the potential to do it eventually, I’m not so confident it can still. Not Bitcoin-SHA256d at least. Bitcoin can’t compete with Gold over its physics. It can only compete on the merits of removing the need for trusted third parties. And how is this going so far? Not great. You introduce third parties in the equation, Bitcoin becomes rather useless. It’s right there, second sentence of the white paper.

https://image.nostr.build/61d8f7ee840d809fd216ca58fa76aff2a002f8423e0c40bb66c76e238e1cdf42.jpg

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "1c797f9d25ba3b4382dc73154c035bdf93a2d513a6648b0dd472fa54fe531229",
  "pubkey": "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff",
  "created_at": 1786782535,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "c83b24dfed4b77a8265b262138d7d9038d65a1daa7a02a9c71e1d6980f992855",
      "",
      "root"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "9bf411417433262799f5462c54fc0fa729fef4d6d7a267ea8a10a6308042c3ce",
      "wss://relay.mostr.pub",
      "reply",
      "c40cd957648b97cb7b5d8b18f3bf3a1e75e479d7db87df531798b8a9b90be5f4"
    ],
    [
      "imeta",
      "url https://image.nostr.build/61d8f7ee840d809fd216ca58fa76aff2a002f8423e0c40bb66c76e238e1cdf42.jpg",
      "blurhash eDRp8.xt-;t6xu~qj[RjayM{?ZRkaeWVRk4.ofWCoexuR:ocRjj[t6",
      "dim 938x827"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "3c4f51561243524f307ed2ee272c7cf4a782404fbe3a176606043b6ad427ee77"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "f33285217e976ad9caf0546445ad8107db98f65967cdce6cce45e60da00ee32a"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "c40cd957648b97cb7b5d8b18f3bf3a1e75e479d7db87df531798b8a9b90be5f4"
    ],
    [
      "r",
      "https://image.nostr.build/61d8f7ee840d809fd216ca58fa76aff2a002f8423e0c40bb66c76e238e1cdf42.jpg"
    ],
    [
      "client",
      "Damus"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "Bitcoin hasn’t repeated Gold’s history, not even a little. Gold was the dominant monetary standard of the world for millennia. Bitcoin hasn’t even managed that on a local level. It certainly had the potential to do it eventually, I’m not so confident it can still. Not Bitcoin-SHA256d at least. Bitcoin can’t compete with Gold over its physics. It can only compete on the merits of removing the need for trusted third parties. And how is this going so far? Not great. You introduce third parties in the equation, Bitcoin becomes rather useless. It’s right there, second sentence of the white paper.\n\nhttps://image.nostr.build/61d8f7ee840d809fd216ca58fa76aff2a002f8423e0c40bb66c76e238e1cdf42.jpg",
  "sig": "02a34276482721e05432148b4b80830c7d2599999c773c3a17a577584414647d4e38ae5f8a81574db54935dab0dddebe54f1c373aaf4c9349d9dc56852451a56"
}