The main falsehood in these claims is the assertion that a s...

Cyph3rp9nk

npub1lnms53w04qt742qnhxag5d6awy7nz6055flnmjkr6jg39hm86dlq7arrnt

hex

58a49512acdeac35a47453db2d7b27e2db935e920deacd15f3068fafc925cd68

nevent

nevent1qqs93fy4z2kdatp453698ked0vn79kunt6fqm6kdzhesdra0eyju66qprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs0eac2gh86s9l24qfmnw52xawhz0f3d862yleaetpafygjmanaxlsrcut8j

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-05-30T15:53:39Z

The main falsehood in these claims is the assertion that a split would only occur if “malicious actors carried out a counter-fork.” A BCH-style counter-fork is not necessary. The following is sufficient:

  1. Some nodes activate BIP-110.
  2. Other nodes/miners do not implement it.
  3. A block is mined that is valid under the old rules but invalid under BIP-110.
  4. BIP-110 nodes reject it; legacy nodes might accept it.

Why are you misleading the community like this?

https://blossom.primal.net/fa506eaed534d266fa00f71ccd43b4c429dfe2e84c7132496d01211f4cb3c672.jpg https://blossom.primal.net/268f64a5a3d72d700a8d4e4cb370b8c10a7caeca4bfb57e3971b2d200e2a80a7.jpg https://blossom.primal.net/d6016200c2025d22a5c1da0feace580e8094ee3f1a61fe436c2755951b6c1f72.jpg

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "58a49512acdeac35a47453db2d7b27e2db935e920deacd15f3068fafc925cd68",
  "pubkey": "fcf70a45cfa817eaa813b9ba8a375d713d3169f4a27f3dcac3d49112df67d37e",
  "created_at": 1780156419,
  "tags": [
    [
      "imeta",
      "url https://blossom.primal.net/fa506eaed534d266fa00f71ccd43b4c429dfe2e84c7132496d01211f4cb3c672.jpg",
      "sha256 fa506eaed534d266fa00f71ccd43b4c429dfe2e84c7132496d01211f4cb3c672"
    ],
    [
      "imeta",
      "url https://blossom.primal.net/268f64a5a3d72d700a8d4e4cb370b8c10a7caeca4bfb57e3971b2d200e2a80a7.jpg",
      "sha256 268f64a5a3d72d700a8d4e4cb370b8c10a7caeca4bfb57e3971b2d200e2a80a7"
    ],
    [
      "imeta",
      "url https://blossom.primal.net/d6016200c2025d22a5c1da0feace580e8094ee3f1a61fe436c2755951b6c1f72.jpg",
      "sha256 d6016200c2025d22a5c1da0feace580e8094ee3f1a61fe436c2755951b6c1f72"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "The main falsehood in these claims is the assertion that a split would only occur if “malicious actors carried out a counter-fork.” A BCH-style counter-fork is not necessary. The following is sufficient:\n\n1. Some nodes activate BIP-110.\n2. Other nodes/miners do not implement it.\n3. A block is mined that is valid under the old rules but invalid under BIP-110.\n4. BIP-110 nodes reject it; legacy nodes might accept it.\n\nWhy are you misleading the community like this?\n\n\nhttps://blossom.primal.net/fa506eaed534d266fa00f71ccd43b4c429dfe2e84c7132496d01211f4cb3c672.jpg\nhttps://blossom.primal.net/268f64a5a3d72d700a8d4e4cb370b8c10a7caeca4bfb57e3971b2d200e2a80a7.jpg\nhttps://blossom.primal.net/d6016200c2025d22a5c1da0feace580e8094ee3f1a61fe436c2755951b6c1f72.jpg",
  "sig": "294cb49b3f12f58beeec1648e90f459d47dd4a3ebee5a4c7d4c830596f648f1828551701d9ec5c11ebdd0bbcf710d8f927341a08038412b41ded3cb37656b8a2"
}