You pretend to be a technical person but you can’t distingui...

Tauri

npub1x9q89st049pnuym57ch9kqkgzcu5dmff32wduwc4g9gnc2w3nlls8hcsg7

hex

844270637ade192d8b90851591b87284694f6dfaf62734562d3407517290e980

nevent

nevent1qqsggsnsvdaduxfd3wgg29v3hpegg620dha0vfe52ckngp63w2gwnqqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsrzsrjc9h6jse7zd60vtjmqtypvw2xa55c48x78v25z5fu98gellcsd4y95

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-02-10T21:52:58Z

↳ 回复 Leo Wandersleb (npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6)

You assume modern spammers are cost-sensitive? They are not. They are hype-sensitive. High fees don't deter them. They validate the "asset" value and ...

You pretend to be a technical person but you can’t distinguish between protocol rules and censorship? That’s a bad look. Refer to the attached image.

You assume modern spammers are cost-sensitive? They are not. They are hype-sensitive. High fees don't deter them. They validate the "asset" value and drive the FOMO cycles they rely on.

🤔 That’s pretty much what I said. Gamified spam is not simple stenography. So you admit fees are not deterrent enough.

You also completely sidestepped the timescale mismatch.

I didn’t. As I said, if BIP110 proves insufficient to meaningfully reduce spam (not eliminate it), there are other proposals on the table that take a far more nuclear approach - the Cat. Those can be deployed as a fallback if needed.

That said, I doubt any investor who built long-term assumptions around a spam-driven business model would willingly push things that far, even if they technically could. The risk profile becomes too asymmetric. If the Bitcoin community hardens its stance towards spam, that entire business can get wiped out overnight. That precedent already exists. Vitalik showed exactly how quickly a community can coordinate and crush an activity once it’s broadly viewed as hostile to the network’s priorities.

https://blossom.primal.net/95a299759fdca7a45335637e165e879d3b6b05e1fbd8878af54d0ed475e0a0c9.jpg

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "844270637ade192d8b90851591b87284694f6dfaf62734562d3407517290e980",
  "pubkey": "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff",
  "created_at": 1770760378,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "dfcea7e09ae2a5c2edad284f536419c79abf52604eb5cae76e3f895ed0f4b3eb",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/",
      "root",
      "846307688a09ec112967eb0544e78a9e88c48f50712c39ed491ff2b6fa019ae8"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "a289886be9c1eab5b5554f4fff112f70cc933141d9924b79493ba806e62413f8",
      "",
      "reply"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "846307688a09ec112967eb0544e78a9e88c48f50712c39ed491ff2b6fa019ae8",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d",
      "",
      "mention"
    ],
    [
      "imeta",
      "url https://blossom.primal.net/95a299759fdca7a45335637e165e879d3b6b05e1fbd8878af54d0ed475e0a0c9.jpg",
      "m jpeg",
      "dim 1284.0x1337.0"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "You pretend to be a technical person but you can’t distinguish between protocol rules and censorship? That’s a bad look. Refer to the attached image.\n\n\u003e You assume modern spammers are cost-sensitive? They are not. They are hype-sensitive. High fees don't deter them. They validate the \"asset\" value and drive the FOMO cycles they rely on.\n\n🤔 That’s pretty much what I said. Gamified spam is not simple stenography. So you admit fees are not deterrent enough.\n\n\u003e You also completely sidestepped the timescale mismatch.\n\nI didn’t. As I said, if BIP110 proves insufficient to meaningfully reduce spam (not eliminate it), there are other proposals on the table that take a far more nuclear approach - the Cat. Those can be deployed as a fallback if needed.\n\nThat said, I doubt any investor who built long-term assumptions around a spam-driven business model would willingly push things that far, even if they technically could. The risk profile becomes too asymmetric. If the Bitcoin community hardens its stance towards spam, that entire business can get wiped out overnight. That precedent already exists. Vitalik showed exactly how quickly a community can coordinate and crush an activity once it’s broadly viewed as hostile to the network’s priorities.\n\n\nhttps://blossom.primal.net/95a299759fdca7a45335637e165e879d3b6b05e1fbd8878af54d0ed475e0a0c9.jpg",
  "sig": "30f7588db1eac576c0872d4e493e47fb8a72521ffa599761755909588cf710903656c8e547b5efc143ee5d297ea72fe980c9f8797308a294f3ed22d7cd8971ca"
}