I think that's changed a lot. I had an ubuntu 14 (iirc) That...

ChipTuner

npub1qdjn8j4gwgmkj3k5un775nq6q3q7mguv5tvajstmkdsqdja2havq03fqm7

hex

c3ca5f14f7bf8d2d0ce5bc757daead7fd17e747a1fe81e142c5fc434897911ce

nevent

nevent1qqsv8jjlznmmlrfdpnjmcata46khl5t7w3apl6q7zsk9l3p539u3rnsprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsqxefne258ydmfgm2wfl02fsdqgs0d5wx29kweg9amxcqxew4t7kqug5rc7

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-03-12T16:09:16Z

↳ 回复 010df0c9... (npub1qyxlpj2gl6dt2nfvkl4yyrl6pr2hjkycrdh2dr5r42n7ktwn7pdqrdmu7u)

My how times have changed to see phones with long term hardware support that rivals alleged server OSes. Not enough of these young guys brag about se...

I think that's changed a lot. I had an ubuntu 14 (iirc) That had over 1000 days of uptime at one point. That wasn't smart, it was because I was lazy and it was a backup machine sitting in a remote location. High uptime is now pretty correlated with low security. I think security-first has shifted heavily since RedHat started to run with it. That means rapid kernel patches, which means package rebuilds and rapid merging. I think leading to this more 3-6 month window like nostr:npub1l6scds4yv7xmcsmhqnhdy9sggm520q09lvts2m5mkvecgr2mmmeqsuj5rc suggested as well of stability. You just have to keep jumping if you want to stay on top of it imo.

Consumer cares more about stability, commercial cares more about 99% forever. If 99.9999 is a goal, but one bug in a package takes you down, it wasn't worth it.

原始 JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "c3ca5f14f7bf8d2d0ce5bc757daead7fd17e747a1fe81e142c5fc434897911ce",
  "pubkey": "036533caa872376946d4e4fdea4c1a0441eda38ca2d9d9417bb36006cbaabf58",
  "created_at": 1773331756,
  "tags": [
    [
      "e",
      "c72c9827eb6b898b5f4cd29bb0018bd34fac394208e45568713018bf4356d58e",
      "wss://nostr.land/",
      "root",
      "010df0c948fe9ab54d2cb7ea420ffa08d57958981b6ea68e83aaa7eb2dd3f05a"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "11c1d3b868163a5bbabe7e6ee31c1895905390dd1b9ff4896bbce812d8602d2e",
      "wss://nostr.wine/",
      "reply",
      "010df0c948fe9ab54d2cb7ea420ffa08d57958981b6ea68e83aaa7eb2dd3f05a"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "fea186c2a4678dbc437704eed2160846e8a781e5fb17056e9bb333840d5bdef2",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "010df0c948fe9ab54d2cb7ea420ffa08d57958981b6ea68e83aaa7eb2dd3f05a",
      "wss://nostr.wine/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "08bfc00b7f72e015f45c326f486bec16e4d5236b70e44543f1c5e86a8e21c76a",
      "wss://nos.lol/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "036533caa872376946d4e4fdea4c1a0441eda38ca2d9d9417bb36006cbaabf58",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "I think that's changed a lot. I had an ubuntu 14 (iirc) That had over 1000 days of uptime at one point. That wasn't smart, it was because I was lazy and it was a backup machine sitting in a remote location. High uptime is now pretty correlated with low security. I think security-first has shifted heavily since RedHat started to run with it. That means rapid kernel patches, which means package rebuilds and rapid merging. I think leading to this more 3-6 month window like nostr:npub1l6scds4yv7xmcsmhqnhdy9sggm520q09lvts2m5mkvecgr2mmmeqsuj5rc suggested as well of stability. You just have to keep jumping if you want to stay on top of it imo. \n\nConsumer cares more about stability, commercial cares more about 99% forever. If 99.9999 is a goal, but one bug in a package takes you down, it wasn't worth it. ",
  "sig": "45e6ecc8398a8319ee2c9aa91224a6273d4b41834d23a4fe8082e8d862150f189042fc50a1a46b66615a04d9fad1c965266c269e22c09cecc2e259461b904621"
}