nah I'm not entirely sure I'm making a real point TBH

f985d309197c805e...

npub1lxzaxzge0jq9u9cecucctdt5lslwgp7hcxmp2l0wn8r2ecjenwasu6svxa

hex

ca198f9b92062cf9fc421004548cf6d897de3656bdb2e9b4e541ccc66b8cd883

nevent

nevent1qqsv5xv0nwfqvt8el3ppqpz53nmd3977xettmvhfknj5rnxxdwxd3qcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgs0npwnpyvheqz7zuvuwvv9k460c0hyqlturds40hhfn34vufvehwc84rm3j

Kind-1 (TextNote)

2026-02-24T05:07:02Z

↳ Reply to Event not found

db9f0a5fdba178cd384c8319c66dcd3e4054c3caeaf5ed08f9af6eb437d41464...

nah I'm not entirely sure I'm making a real point TBH

just that sometimes "evolution" doesn't just mean a specific protocol and whether its changing or not although that is obv what we were talking about but sometimes evolution is a quantum leap in wider perspective (ie digital assets in general rather then Bitcoin specific)

so if we're measuring agreement by the free market of people using software isnt eth where the greatest agreement is?

but even if we just ignore that wider perspective and just focus on BTC I don't think non-economic nodes get a "vote" tbh

Raw JSON

{
  "kind": 1,
  "id": "ca198f9b92062cf9fc421004548cf6d897de3656bdb2e9b4e541ccc66b8cd883",
  "pubkey": "f985d309197c805e1719c73185b574fc3ee407d7c1b6157dee99c6ace2599bbb",
  "created_at": 1771909622,
  "tags": [
    [
      "alt",
      "A short note: nah I'm not entirely sure I'm making a real point ..."
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "b8d0c3194ef8906f83d30a2ddc41480145b15ceadf393407ec49241acb341214",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "root",
      "f985d309197c805e1719c73185b574fc3ee407d7c1b6157dee99c6ace2599bbb"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "355b5dfb7a6dca853818291953a50799d12e77301074edd6cb0b0b14a6b4fc42",
      "wss://nostr.wine/",
      "",
      "f985d309197c805e1719c73185b574fc3ee407d7c1b6157dee99c6ace2599bbb"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "9af646e88bd9c573102d9362a806c526fbd113d263148f9a44d96abc57af6bbd",
      "wss://nostr.wine/",
      "",
      "f985d309197c805e1719c73185b574fc3ee407d7c1b6157dee99c6ace2599bbb"
    ],
    [
      "e",
      "db9f0a5fdba178cd384c8319c66dcd3e4054c3caeaf5ed08f9af6eb437d41464",
      "wss://relay.damus.io/",
      "reply",
      "8d78f3903a1b708c77696e07d2f49065e792b830825679af650313c2d3233370"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "0d3730a793245901d5aa9c70ef01074ea74e89293930185c3c40d4231dee628c",
      "wss://nos.lol/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "8d78f3903a1b708c77696e07d2f49065e792b830825679af650313c2d3233370",
      "wss://relay.primal.net/"
    ],
    [
      "p",
      "f985d309197c805e1719c73185b574fc3ee407d7c1b6157dee99c6ace2599bbb",
      "wss://nostr.wine/"
    ]
  ],
  "content": "nah I'm not entirely sure I'm making a real point TBH \n\njust that sometimes \"evolution\" doesn't just mean a specific protocol and whether its changing or not\nalthough that is obv what we were talking about \nbut sometimes evolution is a quantum leap in wider perspective (ie digital assets in general rather then Bitcoin specific)\n\nso if we're measuring agreement by the free market of people using software \nisnt eth where the greatest agreement is?\n\nbut even if we just ignore that wider perspective and just focus on BTC \nI don't think non-economic nodes get a \"vote\" tbh",
  "sig": "1e4b76348c71ac292664a29cf8496aa8c1bd6e5fe3940b894b2f2918524f4db3a5f94e116828bc93437d412aec2d25c3aabb15df85283ac8c7b74b50dc321e27"
}