Good, I’ll come back to you in a couple of hours then.

npub1x9q89st049pnuym57ch9kqkgzcu5dmff32wduwc4g9gnc2w3nlls8hcsg7
hex
d888c365619f44584c38814097bfc6500f80e08a3241ecc1d5902b474d12b54fnevent
nevent1qqsd3zxrv4se73zcfsugzsyhhlr9qruquz9rys0vc82eq268f5ft2ncprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem4d36kwatvw5hx6mm9qgsrzsrjc9h6jse7zd60vtjmqtypvw2xa55c48x78v25z5fu98gellcsxvpqkKind-1 (TextNote)
↳ 回复 OceanSlim (npub1zmc6qyqdfnllhnzzxr5wpepfpnzcf8q6m3jdveflmgruqvd3qa9sjv7f60)
Please do. I'll let you know if they're in my personal library. I have a lot of PDF and epubs that are not there. But I do lean into more of the ana...
Good, I’ll come back to you in a couple of hours then.
There is no such thing as pure economics. That’s Keynesian nonsense. Economics is a social…err, “science” for lack of a better word — that studies human action, and human action is not uniform. That’s why I keep cringing when I see someone say “free market will fix this” or “Ocean will go out of business because no one will leave money on the table.” It sure has lots of common ground with philosophy. Also history and anthropology. Mises is amazing when giving examples of human action from the history of humankind. It gives you a ton of perspective on why certain people act like psychopaths when faced with certain choices, restrictions, or opportunities. Markets are rarely sane because markets are made of humans, and humans often don’t act rationally or logically the way theories dictate. Knots is a collection of humans, therefore they are part of the market the same as the Ord retards and anyone in between. Their choices shape sentiment, opportunities, and risk tolerance. Even if they don’t throw money left and right, their stance and actions create perception and surely influence to a degree how other humans engage with the market. /end rant
原始 JSON
{
"kind": 1,
"id": "d888c365619f44584c38814097bfc6500f80e08a3241ecc1d5902b474d12b54f",
"pubkey": "314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff",
"created_at": 1778685837,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6c01e6dc074031daeeda6c9a0777173ee89bf6a7d0d6ee005137221b01cef34f",
"wss://nostr.petrkr.net/strfry",
"root",
"846307688a09ec112967eb0544e78a9e88c48f50712c39ed491ff2b6fa019ae8"
],
[
"e",
"d033fd5cbe27a8ac7a8077d9c40372f065b51bd77adf7adde2fd2ea20bf6966b",
"wss://nostr.mom/alpha",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"846307688a09ec112967eb0544e78a9e88c48f50712c39ed491ff2b6fa019ae8",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"16f1a0100d4cfffbcc4230e8e0e4290cc5849c1adc64d6653fda07c031b1074b",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "Good, I’ll come back to you in a couple of hours then.\n\nThere is no such thing as pure economics. That’s Keynesian nonsense. Economics is a social…err, “science” for lack of a better word — that studies human action, and human action is not uniform. That’s why I keep cringing when I see someone say “free market will fix this” or “Ocean will go out of business because no one will leave money on the table.” It sure has lots of common ground with philosophy. Also history and anthropology. Mises is amazing when giving examples of human action from the history of humankind. It gives you a ton of perspective on why certain people act like psychopaths when faced with certain choices, restrictions, or opportunities. Markets are rarely sane because markets are made of humans, and humans often don’t act rationally or logically the way theories dictate. Knots is a collection of humans, therefore they are part of the market the same as the Ord retards and anyone in between. Their choices shape sentiment, opportunities, and risk tolerance. Even if they don’t throw money left and right, their stance and actions create perception and surely influence to a degree how other humans engage with the market. /end rant ",
"sig": "4b5b1efc195f33a964ab09a36b370b95b2e31fac9b6518bcbc04c3edf9cbfc08ed48d9bfa2003f590c340425b323d9017bdd98532552054f14e7a5da58d6e230"
}